Kimi K2.7 Code vs Step 3.7 Flash
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Step 3.7 Flash by StepFun? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 12.1 points higher (43.0 vs 30.9) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $320; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Kimi K2.7 Code when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Step 3.7 Flash.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Step 3.7 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.0 | 30.9 | −28.1% Step 3.7 Flash is 28.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.58 | $319.97 | −41.2% Step 3.7 Flash is 41.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 66.82s | 7.79s | −88.3% Step 3.7 Flash is 88.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.20 / $1.15 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Step 3.7 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 28.1% less intelligence, 41.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 88.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
- Step 3.7 Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
Kimi K2.7 CodeStep 3.7 FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/step-3-7-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/step-3-7-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill