MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Step 3.7 Flash
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi or Step 3.7 Flash by StepFun? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Step 3.7 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 28.0% less intelligence, 223.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 79.8% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Step 3.7 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.9 | 30.9 | −28.0% Step 3.7 Flash is 28.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $98.86 | $319.97 | +223.7% Step 3.7 Flash is 3.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 38.52s | 7.79s | −79.8% Step 3.7 Flash is 79.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.20 / $1.15 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort) scores 51.80 for $72.0.
- Step 3.7 Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
MiMo-V2.5-ProStep 3.7 FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/step-3-7-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/step-3-7-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill