MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M2.7 by MiniMax or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M2.7
Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiniMax-M2.7: 56.5% less intelligence, 101.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 86.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiniMax-M2.7 | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 23.2 | 10.1 | −56.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 56.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $235.96 | $476.03 | +101.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 42.23s | 5.52s | −86.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 86.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M2.7 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) scores 34.80 for $179.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
MiniMax-M2.7Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m2-7/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m2-7/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill