Mistral Large 3 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 3 by Mistral or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3 Coder Next scores 5.2 points higher (21.1 vs 15.9) but costs 3.5× as much to run the benchmark ($247 vs $71.0; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3 Coder Next when you need intelligence above 15.9, and Mistral Large 3 when 15.9 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Large 3 | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.9 | 21.1 | +32.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 32.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $71.04 | $247.26 | +248.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 3.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.76s | 6.61s | −38.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 38.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.50 / $1.50 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Mistral Large 3: 32.7% more intelligence, 248.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 38.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 scores 37.20 for $25.2.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
Mistral Large 3Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-3/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-3/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill