Mistral Large 3 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 3 by Mistral or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3 Coder Next scores 0.4 points higher (10.1 vs 9.7) but costs 3.7× as much to run the benchmark ($476 vs $130; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3 Coder Next when you need intelligence above 9.7, and Mistral Large 3 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Large 3 | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 10.1 | +4.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 4.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $129.94 | $476.03 | +266.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 3.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.32s | 5.52s | −24.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 24.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.50 / $1.50 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Mistral Large 3: 4.1% more intelligence, 266.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 24.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 scores 22.30 for $42.6.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Mistral Large 3Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-3/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-3/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill