Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Mistral Medium 3.1 by Mistral or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3 Coder Next scores 6.4 points higher (21.1 vs 14.7) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($247 vs $132; both mid-range class). Pick Qwen3 Coder Next when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Medium 3.1.
| Metric | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.7 | 21.1 | +43.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 43.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $131.59 | $247.26 | +87.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 87.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.25s | 6.61s | −8.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 8.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.40 / $2.00 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Mistral Medium 3.1: 43.5% more intelligence, 87.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 8.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Medium 3.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores 42.20 for $98.5.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
Mistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-medium-3-1/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-medium-3-1/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill