Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Mistral Medium 3.1 by Mistral or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-22.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Mistral Medium 3.1
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Mistral Medium 3.1: the same intelligence, 17.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 17.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.2 | 9.2 | Even |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $405.87 | $476.23 | +17.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 17.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.93s | 6.95s | +17.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 17.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.40 / $2.00 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Medium 3.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Mistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-medium-3-1/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-medium-3-1/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill