Muse Glimmer (high) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Muse Glimmer (high) by Meta or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Glimmer (high)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Muse Glimmer (high): 39.3% less intelligence, 138.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 78.7% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Muse Glimmer (high) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.1 | 21.3 | −39.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 39.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $105.03 | $250.18 | +138.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.35s | 4.97s | −78.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 78.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.32 / $1.35 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Glimmer (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) scores 50.10 for $95.1.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
Muse Glimmer (high)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-glimmer/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-glimmer/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill