Nova 2.0 Lite (high) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Nova 2.0 Lite (high) by Amazon or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-18.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Nova 2.0 Lite (high): 15.9% more intelligence, 61.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 77.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Nova 2.0 Lite (high) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.2 | 21.1 | +15.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 15.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $634.82 | $247.26 | −61.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 61.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.14s | 6.89s | −77.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 77.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nova 2.0 Lite (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Grok 4.5 (high) scores 53.80 for $602.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
Nova 2.0 Lite (high)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nova-2-0-lite-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nova-2-0-lite-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill