Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (low) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (low) by Amazon or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3 Coder Next scores 1.5 points higher (21.1 vs 19.6) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($247 vs $244; both mid-range class). Pick Qwen3 Coder Next when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (low).
| Metric | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (low) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 19.6 | 21.1 | +7.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 7.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $243.65 | $247.26 | +1.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 1.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.66s | 6.61s | −79.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 79.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (low): 7.7% more intelligence, 1.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 79.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (low)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nova-2-0-pro-reasoning-low/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nova-2-0-pro-reasoning-low/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill