Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) by Amazon or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) scores 0.7 points higher (21.8 vs 21.1) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($407 vs $247; both mid-range class). Pick Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.8 | 21.1 | −3.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 3.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $406.78 | $247.26 | −39.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 39.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 32.76s | 6.61s | −79.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 79.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium): 3.2% less intelligence, 39.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 79.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Sol (low) scores 49.40 for $353.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nova-2-0-pro-reasoning-medium/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nova-2-0-pro-reasoning-medium/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill