Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (Non-reasoning) by Amazon or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3 Coder Next scores 6.7 points higher (21.1 vs 14.4) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($247 vs $206; both mid-range class). Pick Qwen3 Coder Next when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.4 | 21.1 | +46.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 46.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $206.40 | $247.26 | +19.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 19.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.73s | 6.61s | +15.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 15.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (Non-reasoning): 46.5% more intelligence, 19.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 15.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiniMax-M3 scores 44.40 for $204.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nova-2-0-pro/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nova-2-0-pro/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill