Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Quasar 438B (max, based on GLM-5.2)

Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Quasar 438B (max, based on GLM-5.2). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MicrosoftPhi-4 Mini InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.30
Total cost
-
Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (max, based on GLM-5.2)Off the frontier
Intelligence
27.10
Total cost
$2504
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricPhi-4 Mini InstructQuasar 438B (max, based on GLM-5.2)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)6.327.1+330.2% Quasar 438B (max, bas… is 4.3× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$2,503.70— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.89s16.15s+35.8% Quasar 438B (max, bas… is 35.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.00 / $0.00$0.60 / $1.80
Input modalitiesNot reportedNot reported
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerPhi-4 Mini Instruct: what beats itQuasar 438B (max, based on GLM-5.2): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/phi-4-mini/quasar-438b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/phi-4-mini/quasar-438b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill