Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning)

Phi-4 Mini Instruct vs Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MicrosoftPhi-4 Mini InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.70
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 14B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricPhi-4 Mini InstructQwen3 14B (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)5.76.8+19.3% Qwen3 14B (Non-reason… is 19.3% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)12.71s13.14s+3.4% Qwen3 14B (Non-reason… is 3.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.00 / $0.00$0.35 / $1.40
Input modalitiesNot reportedNot reported
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerPhi-4 Mini Instruct: what beats itQwen3 14B (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/phi-4-mini/qwen3-14b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/phi-4-mini/qwen3-14b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill