Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning): 20.5% less intelligence, 102.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 88.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.7 | 10.1 | −20.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 20.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $234.72 | $476.03 | +102.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.34s | 5.52s | −88.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 88.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.23 / $2.30 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) scores 34.80 for $179.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill