Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-18.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) scores 9.4 points higher (30.5 vs 21.1) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($356 vs $247; both mid-range class). Pick Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.5 | 21.1 | −30.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 30.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $356.13 | $247.26 | −30.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 30.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.66s | 6.89s | −45.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 45.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.60 / $3.60 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning): 30.8% less intelligence, 30.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 45.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Sol (low) scores 49.40 for $353.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-6-27b-non-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-6-27b-non-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill