Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 17.9 points higher (39.0 vs 21.1) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($303 vs $247; both mid-range class). Pick Qwen3.7 Plus when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Plus | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.0 | 21.1 | −45.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 45.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $302.65 | $247.26 | −18.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 18.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.79s | 6.61s | −86.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 86.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.40 / $1.60 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3.7 Plus: 45.9% less intelligence, 18.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 86.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (high) scores 46.10 for $275.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
Qwen3.7 PlusQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-plus/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-plus/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill