Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 18.1 points higher (39.4 vs 21.3) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($322 vs $250; both mid-range class). Pick Qwen3.7 Plus when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Plus | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.4 | 21.3 | −45.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 45.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $322.40 | $250.18 | −22.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 22.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 47.20s | 4.63s | −90.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 90.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.40 / $1.60 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3.7 Plus: 45.9% less intelligence, 22.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 90.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) scores 53.40 for $278.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
Qwen3.7 PlusQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-plus/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-plus/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill