Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 15.7 points higher (25.8 vs 10.1) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($568 vs $476; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Qwen3.7 Plus when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Plus | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 10.1 | −60.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 60.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $568.49 | $476.03 | −16.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 16.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.85s | 5.52s | −88.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 88.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.40 / $1.60 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3.7 Plus: 60.9% less intelligence, 16.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 88.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Qwen3.7 PlusQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-plus/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-plus/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill