Qwen3.7 Plus vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 14.9 points higher (25.8 vs 10.9) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($568 vs $518; both premium class). Pick Qwen3.7 Plus when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Trinity Large Thinking.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Plus | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 10.9 | −57.8% Trinity Large Thinking is 57.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $568.49 | $518.07 | −8.9% Trinity Large Thinking is 8.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.85s | 8.78s | −81.3% Trinity Large Thinking is 81.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.40 / $1.60 | $0.25 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Qwen3.7 Plus: 57.8% less intelligence, 8.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 81.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Qwen3.7 PlusTrinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-plus/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-plus/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill