Qwen3 Coder Next vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-04.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Solar Mini 4 scores 14.9 points higher (24.1 vs 9.2) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($497 vs $476; both mid-range class). Pick Solar Mini 4 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Qwen3 Coder Next | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.2 | 24.1 | +162.0% Solar Mini 4 is 2.6× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $476.23 | $497.12 | +4.4% Solar Mini 4 is 4.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.32s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.35 / $1.20 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Mini 4 vs Qwen3 Coder Next: 162.0% more intelligence, 4.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Qwen3 Coder NextSolar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-coder-next/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-coder-next/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill