Qwen3 Coder Next vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3 Coder Next scores 1.0 points higher (14.1 vs 13.1) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($388 vs $327; both mid-range class). Pick Qwen3 Coder Next when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Trinity Large Thinking.
| Metric | Qwen3 Coder Next | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.1 | 13.1 | −7.1% Trinity Large Thinking is 7.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $388.17 | $326.95 | −15.8% Trinity Large Thinking is 15.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.52s | 8.90s | +61.2% Trinity Large Thinking is 61.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.35 / $1.20 | $0.25 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Qwen3 Coder Next: 7.1% less intelligence, 15.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 61.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 46.20 for $219.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 46.20 for $219.
Qwen3 Coder NextTrinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-coder-next/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-coder-next/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill