Qwen3 Coder Next vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Trinity Large Thinking scores 0.8 points higher (10.9 vs 10.1) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($518 vs $476; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Trinity Large Thinking when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Qwen3 Coder Next | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 10.1 | 10.9 | +7.9% Trinity Large Thinking is 7.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $476.03 | $518.07 | +8.8% Trinity Large Thinking is 8.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.99s | 9.00s | +50.3% Trinity Large Thinking is 50.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.35 / $1.20 | $0.25 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Qwen3 Coder Next: 7.9% more intelligence, 8.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 50.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Qwen3 Coder NextTrinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-coder-next/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-coder-next/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill