Solar Pro 4 vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Solar Pro 4 by Upstage or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Solar Pro 4 scores 22.9 points higher (41.6 vs 18.7) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($321 vs $255; both mid-range class). Pick Solar Pro 4 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Trinity Large Thinking.
| Metric | Solar Pro 4 | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.6 | 18.7 | −55.0% Trinity Large Thinking is 55.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $320.92 | $254.72 | −20.6% Trinity Large Thinking is 20.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 55.85s | 14.08s | −74.8% Trinity Large Thinking is 74.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.23 / $0.88 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Solar Pro 4: 55.0% less intelligence, 20.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 74.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Solar Pro 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) scores 53.40 for $278.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
Solar Pro 4Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/solar-pro4/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/solar-pro4/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill