Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning)
Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta | GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.2 | 15.5 | −56.0% GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-rea… is 56.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $22.97 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.52s | 5.06s | −79.4% GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-rea… is 79.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $0.20 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-beta/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-beta/gpt-5-6-luna-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill