Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)

Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Sapiens AIAgnes 2.5 Pro BetaNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
35.20
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 32B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricAgnes 2.5 Pro BetaQwen3 32B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)35.27.2−79.5% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 79.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)23.29s91.88s+294.5% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 294.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.30$0.24 / $0.54
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerAgnes 2.5 Pro Beta: what beats itQwen3 32B (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-beta/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-beta/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill