Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallba… scores 24.2 points higher (48.2 vs 24.0) but costs 5.1× as much to run the benchmark ($2031 vs $397; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallba… when you need intelligence above 24.0, and Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when 24.0 is enough.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 48.2 | +100.8% Claude Opus 5.5 (Medi… is 2.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $2,031.27 | +411.9% Claude Opus 5.5 (Medi… is 5.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 27.55s | +128.3% Claude Opus 5.5 (Medi… is 128.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 100.8% more intelligence, 411.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 128.3% slower end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/claude-opus-5-5-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/claude-opus-5-5-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill