Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallba… scores 17.5 points higher (41.5 vs 24.0) but costs 3.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1268 vs $397; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallba… when you need intelligence above 24.0, and Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when 24.0 is enough.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 41.5 | +72.9% Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Hi… is 72.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $1,268.30 | +219.6% Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Hi… is 3.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 15.66s | +29.7% Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Hi… is 29.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 72.9% more intelligence, 219.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 29.7% slower end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/claude-sonnet-5-5-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/claude-sonnet-5-5-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill