Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) scores 8.6 points higher (32.6 vs 24.0) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($521 vs $397; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 32.6 | +35.8% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1… is 35.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $520.63 | +31.2% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1… is 31.2% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 18.42s | +52.6% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1… is 52.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 35.8% more intelligence, 31.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 52.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill