Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 47.5% less intelligence, 94.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 33.8% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 12.6 | −47.5% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 47.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $771.03 | +94.3% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 94.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 7.99s | −33.8% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 33.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $1.32 / $3.96 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill