Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Low)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) scores 30.2 points higher (54.2 vs 24.0) but costs 14× as much to run the benchmark ($5725 vs $397; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) when you need intelligence above 24.0, and Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when 24.0 is enough.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 54.2 | +125.8% Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is 2.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $5,725.02 | +1342.7% Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is 14× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 10.35s | −14.3% Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is 14.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 125.8% more intelligence, 1342.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 14.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.40 for $4766.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaGemini 4 Carbon (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gemini-4-carbon-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gemini-4-carbon-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill