Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs GPT-6.1 Sol (High)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or GPT-6.1 Sol (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 26.3 points higher (50.3 vs 24.0) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($573 vs $397; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | GPT-6.1 Sol (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 50.3 | +109.6% GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is 2.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $573.17 | +44.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is 44.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 59.10s | +389.6% GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is 389.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (High) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 109.6% more intelligence, 44.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 389.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaGPT-6.1 Sol (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gpt-6-1-sol-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gpt-6-1-sol-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill