Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs GPT-6 Astra (High)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or GPT-6 Astra (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (High) scores 30.8 points higher (54.8 vs 24.0) but costs 8.1× as much to run the benchmark ($3204 vs $397; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (High) when you need intelligence above 24.0, and Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when 24.0 is enough.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | GPT-6 Astra (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 54.8 | +128.3% GPT-6 Astra (High) is 2.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $3,204.00 | +707.4% GPT-6 Astra (High) is 8.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 110.54s | +815.8% GPT-6 Astra (High) is 815.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (High) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 128.3% more intelligence, 707.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 815.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- GPT-6 Astra (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaGPT-6 Astra (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gpt-6-astra-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gpt-6-astra-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill