Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs GPT-6 Astra (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or GPT-6 Astra (Medium) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Medium) scores 27.6 points higher (51.6 vs 24.0) but costs 6.6× as much to run the benchmark ($2638 vs $397; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Medium) when you need intelligence above 24.0, and Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when 24.0 is enough.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | GPT-6 Astra (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 51.6 | +115.0% GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is 2.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $2,638.29 | +564.8% GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is 6.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 17.41s | +44.2% GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is 44.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Medium) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 115.0% more intelligence, 564.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 44.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaGPT-6 Astra (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gpt-6-astra-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gpt-6-astra-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill