Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Muse Ember (Max)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Muse Ember (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Max)
Muse Ember (Max) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 50.0% more intelligence, 70.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 12.3% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Muse Ember (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 36.0 | +50.0% Muse Ember (Max) is 50.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $117.12 | −70.5% Muse Ember (Max) is 70.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.50s | 10.09s | −12.3% Muse Ember (Max) is 12.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaMuse Ember (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/muse-ember · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/muse-ember?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill