Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 27.1% less intelligence, 312.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 427.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 17.5 | −27.1% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 27.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $1,636.35 | +312.3% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 4.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 63.66s | +427.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 427.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaQwen3.8 27B (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/qwen3-8-27b-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/qwen3-8-27b-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill