Apertus 8B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)
Apertus 8B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Apertus 8B Instruct | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 4.8 | 24.7 | +414.6% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (… is 5.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $238.91 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.29s | 2.71s | −62.8% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (… is 62.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.20 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apertus-8b-instruct/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apertus-8b-instruct/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill