Apodex 1.1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Apodex 1.1: 56.1% more intelligence, 83.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 41.2 | +56.1% Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhi… is 56.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $157.58 | −83.2% Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhi… is 83.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 69.76s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Apodex 1.1Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill