Apodex 1.1 vs Claude Opus 5 (High)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Claude Opus 5 (High) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (High) scores 21.7 points higher (48.1 vs 26.4) but costs 4.6× as much to run the benchmark ($4332 vs $939; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (High) when you need intelligence above 26.4, and Apodex 1.1 when 26.4 is enough.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Claude Opus 5 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 48.1 | +82.2% Claude Opus 5 (High) is 82.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $4,331.68 | +361.3% Claude Opus 5 (High) is 4.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 24.66s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $5.00 / $25.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Claude Opus 5 (High) vs Apodex 1.1: 82.2% more intelligence, 361.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Claude Opus 5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Apodex 1.1Claude Opus 5 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/claude-opus-5-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/claude-opus-5-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill