Apodex 1.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Apodex 1.1 scores 2.0 points higher (26.4 vs 24.4) but costs 7.7× as much to run the benchmark ($939 vs $121; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Apodex 1.1 when you need intelligence above 24.4, and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) when 24.4 is enough.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 24.4 | −7.6% DeepSeek V4 Flash 042… is 7.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $121.20 | −87.1% DeepSeek V4 Flash 042… is 87.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.11 / $0.23 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs Apodex 1.1: 7.6% less intelligence, 87.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
Apodex 1.1DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill