Apodex 1.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon (High)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Argon (High) scores 26.2 points higher (52.6 vs 26.4) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($2407 vs $939; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Gemini 4 Argon (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Apodex 1.1.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Gemini 4 Argon (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 52.6 | +99.2% Gemini 4 Argon (High) is 99.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $2,407.24 | +156.3% Gemini 4 Argon (High) is 2.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 63.20s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs Apodex 1.1: 99.2% more intelligence, 156.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Gemini 4 Argon (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Apodex 1.1Gemini 4 Argon (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gemini-4-argon · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gemini-4-argon?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill