Apodex 1.1 vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) scores 11.6 points higher (38.0 vs 26.4) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1187 vs $939; both premium class). Pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Apodex 1.1.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 38.0 | +43.9% GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) is 43.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $938.99 | $1,186.77 | +26.4% GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) is 26.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 31.98s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) vs Apodex 1.1: 43.9% more intelligence, 26.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Apodex 1.1GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gpt-5-6-terra-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gpt-5-6-terra-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill