Apodex 1.1 vs GPT-6 Astra (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or GPT-6 Astra (Medium) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Medium) scores 23.2 points higher (49.6 vs 26.4) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($2434 vs $939; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick GPT-6 Astra (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Apodex 1.1.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | GPT-6 Astra (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 49.6 | +87.9% GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is 87.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $2,434.12 | +159.2% GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is 2.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 13.89s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Medium) vs Apodex 1.1: 87.9% more intelligence, 159.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Apodex 1.1GPT-6 Astra (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gpt-6-astra-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gpt-6-astra-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill