Apodex 1.1 vs Grok 4.6 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) scores 17.8 points higher (44.2 vs 26.4) but costs 2.4× as much to run the benchmark ($2242 vs $939; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Apodex 1.1.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 44.2 | +67.4% Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) is 67.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $2,241.91 | +138.7% Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) is 2.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 39.83s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) vs Apodex 1.1: 67.4% more intelligence, 138.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Apodex 1.1Grok 4.6 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/grok-4-6-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/grok-4-6-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill