Apodex 1.1 vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 12.0 points higher (38.4 vs 26.4) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($1608 vs $939; both premium class). Pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Apodex 1.1.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 38.4 | +45.5% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 45.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $1,607.86 | +71.2% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 71.2% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 25.45s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Apodex 1.1: 45.5% more intelligence, 71.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Apodex 1.1Mistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill