Apodex 1.1 vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Apodex 1.1 scores 8.9 points higher (26.4 vs 17.5) but costs 6.4× as much to run the benchmark ($939 vs $146; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Apodex 1.1 when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 17.5 | −33.7% Muse Glimmer (High) is 33.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $145.77 | −84.5% Muse Glimmer (High) is 84.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 24.79s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Apodex 1.1: 33.7% less intelligence, 84.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Apodex 1.1Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill