Apodex 1.1 vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 26.0 points higher (52.4 vs 26.4) but costs 6.2× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $939; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 26.4, and Apodex 1.1 when 26.4 is enough.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 52.4 | +98.5% Muse Wonder (Max) is 98.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $5,786.78 | +516.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 6.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 43.73s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Apodex 1.1: 98.5% more intelligence, 516.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Apodex 1.1Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill