Apodex 1.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Apodex 1.1: 0.4% more intelligence, 69.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 26.5 | +0.4% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 0.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $286.07 | −69.5% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 69.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 6.31s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Apodex 1.1Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill