Apodex 1.1 vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) scores 7.3 points higher (33.7 vs 26.4) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1336 vs $939; both premium class). Pick Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Apodex 1.1.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 33.7 | +27.7% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 27.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $1,336.09 | +42.3% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 42.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 59.76s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs Apodex 1.1: 27.7% more intelligence, 42.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Apodex 1.1Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/qwen3-8-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/qwen3-8-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill