Celeris-1 vs Claude Opus 5 (High)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or Claude Opus 5 (High) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (High) scores 41.8 points higher (48.1 vs 6.3) but costs 72× as much to run the benchmark ($4332 vs $60.0; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (High) when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Claude Opus 5 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 48.1 | +663.5% Claude Opus 5 (High) is 7.6× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $4,331.68 | +7120.7% Claude Opus 5 (High) is 72× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 20.99s | +2312.6% Claude Opus 5 (High) is 2312.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $5.00 / $25.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Claude Opus 5 (High) vs Celeris-1: 663.5% more intelligence, 7120.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2312.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Claude Opus 5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Celeris-1Claude Opus 5 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/claude-opus-5-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/claude-opus-5-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill